Solutions

Enterprise solutions that combine our practice areas into complete, production-grade outcomes. Each is delivered in your own cloud accounts, aligned to the frameworks you are assessed against, and transferred to your team.

Cloud Migration and Modernization

Move application portfolios from legacy and virtualized infrastructure to a governed AWS and Kubernetes platform, in controlled waves, without disrupting the business.

Business challenge

Enterprises carry portfolios of legacy applications on aging infrastructure, with rising operating cost, limited elasticity, and growing security exposure. Migration programs stall when the target platform, governance model, and cutover plan are not established before the first workload moves.

Our approach

We establish the target platform first: a multi-account AWS foundation and an Amazon EKS platform with identity, networking, guardrails, and delivery pipelines in place. Workloads are then assessed, grouped into waves, and migrated against defined cutover, validation, and rollback criteria.

Key capabilities

  • Portfolio assessment and migration wave planning
  • Multi-account, multi-region AWS landing zone delivered as code
  • Re-platforming to containers and managed AWS services
  • Data migration and cutover with validated rollback
  • Operating model, runbooks, and knowledge transfer
  • Decommissioning of legacy environments

Business outcomes

  • Retirement of end-of-life infrastructure and its operating cost
  • One standardized, auditable platform for every migrated workload
  • Predictable cutovers with documented rollback

Aligned to

  • AWS Well-Architected Framework
  • AWS Cloud Adoption Framework
  • NIST CSF 2.0

Technologies

  • AWS Control Tower
  • Amazon EKS
  • Amazon Aurora
  • Terraform
  • Argo CD

Enterprise Platform Engineering

A standardized internal developer platform that lets many teams ship securely on shared, governed infrastructure.

Business challenge

As engineering organizations grow, each team assembles its own pipelines, clusters, and security controls. The result is duplicated effort, an inconsistent security posture, and platform teams that cannot keep pace with demand.

Our approach

We build an internal developer platform on Amazon EKS and run it as a product: reproducible multi-cluster infrastructure, self-service golden paths, GitOps delivery with controlled promotion, a secured software supply chain, and tenant isolation enforced by policy.

Key capabilities

  • Multi-cluster Amazon EKS reference architecture
  • Self-service golden paths and tenant onboarding
  • GitOps delivery with controlled environment promotion
  • Signed artifacts, SBOMs, and admission policy
  • Autoscaling and cost allocation by team
  • Lifecycle management: scheduled upgrades and patching

Business outcomes

  • A consistent security and compliance posture across teams
  • Shorter lead time from commit to production
  • Platform capacity that grows without proportional headcount

Aligned to

  • CIS Kubernetes and Amazon EKS Benchmarks
  • NIST SSDF (SP 800-218)
  • SLSA

Technologies

  • Amazon EKS
  • Argo CD
  • Kargo
  • Karpenter
  • Kyverno
  • Sigstore Cosign

Zero Trust Security Architecture

Replace implicit network trust with identity-based access, segmented workloads, and encrypted traffic from the edge to the data tier.

Business challenge

Perimeter security assumes that anything inside the network can be trusted. In multi-account and multi-cluster environments that assumption fails: one compromised workload or credential can move laterally. Regulators and California state cloud policy now expect zero trust architecture, and retired edge components such as Ingress NGINX add unpatched exposure.

Our approach

We implement zero trust across the identity, network, and workload layers: federated single sign-on with least-privilege roles, default-deny network policy with encrypted service-to-service traffic, a modern application edge on Gateway API and AWS WAF, and continuous verification through runtime detection.

Key capabilities

  • Federated identity and least-privilege access model
  • Microsegmentation with default-deny network policy
  • Encrypted service-to-service traffic across clusters
  • Application edge modernization on Gateway API with AWS WAF
  • Secrets management and workload identity
  • Runtime threat detection with alert routing

Business outcomes

  • Reduced lateral movement and a smaller blast radius
  • An internet-facing edge built on supported, patched components
  • Access decisions that are logged and attributable

Aligned to

  • CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model
  • NIST SP 800-207
  • California SAM 4983.1

Technologies

  • IAM Identity Center
  • Cilium
  • Gateway API
  • AWS WAF
  • External Secrets
  • Falco

Regulatory Compliance Automation

Turn compliance from a periodic audit exercise into a continuous, evidenced property of the platform.

Business challenge

Compliance programs that rely on manual evidence collection are expensive, slow, and out of date the day after the audit. As frameworks move toward continuous assurance, organizations need controls that the platform enforces and evidence that is produced automatically.

Our approach

We map your control framework to technical controls, enforce them through policy as code, and build an evidence pipeline that continuously collects configuration state, access records, and change history into a tamper-evident store your auditors and security office can query.

Key capabilities

  • Control matrix mapped to your regulatory framework
  • Policy as code enforced at deployment and at runtime
  • Centralized, tamper-evident audit logging
  • Automated evidence collection and control reporting
  • Vulnerability and patch management automation
  • Audit preparation and assessor support

Business outcomes

  • Audit evidence available on demand
  • Control drift detected and corrected continuously
  • Shorter audit preparation for engineering and security teams

Aligned to

  • NIST SP 800-53
  • NIST CSF 2.0
  • SOC 2
  • HIPAA Security Rule
  • PCI DSS
  • California SAM 5300

Technologies

  • AWS Security Hub
  • AWS Config
  • AWS CloudTrail
  • Kyverno
  • OPA Gatekeeper

Enterprise Data Protection and Privacy

Protect regulated and personal data across production, analytics, and non-production environments.

Business challenge

Sensitive data rarely stays in one system. It is copied into test environments, analytics platforms, logs, and backups, each with weaker controls than production. Privacy regulation and breach liability follow the data wherever it goes.

Our approach

We classify sensitive data, encrypt it with customer-managed keys, restrict and record access, and remove it from places it does not need to be, using masking pipelines for non-production environments and redaction for logs and telemetry.

Key capabilities

  • Sensitive data inventory and classification
  • Encryption at rest and in transit with customer-managed keys
  • Deterministic masking pipelines for non-production data
  • Personal data redaction in logs and telemetry
  • Fine-grained access control with complete access logging
  • Backup protection and retention controls

Business outcomes

  • Personal data confined to systems designed to protect it
  • Realistic test data without privacy exposure
  • A complete record of who accessed which records

Aligned to

  • HIPAA Security Rule
  • PCI DSS
  • CCPA and CPRA
  • NIST Privacy Framework

Technologies

  • AWS KMS
  • Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL
  • MongoDB Atlas
  • Fluent Bit

Mission-Critical Resilience and Disaster Recovery

Engineer business-critical systems to meet defined availability and recovery objectives, and prove it through testing.

Business challenge

A recovery plan that has never been exercised is an assumption. For systems that process transactions, serve the public, or support clinical operations, the cost of an extended outage is measured in revenue, regulatory exposure, and public trust.

Our approach

We define recovery time and recovery point objectives with business owners, design multi-zone and multi-region architectures to meet them, instrument services end to end, and run scheduled failover and restoration exercises that produce documented results.

Key capabilities

  • Recovery objectives agreed with business owners
  • Multi-availability-zone and multi-region architecture
  • Service-level objectives and error budgets
  • End-to-end observability with OpenTelemetry
  • Scheduled failover and restoration exercises
  • Incident response process and post-incident review

Business outcomes

  • Recovery capability demonstrated by test results
  • Incidents detected by monitoring before customers report them
  • Contingency evidence ready for auditors and regulators

Aligned to

  • NIST SP 800-34
  • AWS Well-Architected Reliability Pillar
  • ISO 22301

Technologies

  • Amazon EKS
  • Amazon Aurora
  • Cilium ClusterMesh
  • OpenTelemetry
  • Prometheus
  • Grafana

Enterprise Generative AI Platform

A governed foundation for generative AI in your own cloud, with the controls regulated organizations require.

Business challenge

Business units want generative AI now, while security, legal, and compliance teams need assurance about data handling, accuracy, and accountability. Unmanaged adoption produces shadow AI use and pilots that cannot pass a risk review.

Our approach

We build a central AI platform inside your AWS environment: a model gateway with access, usage, and cost controls; retrieval over approved data sources; an evaluation framework; guardrails and human review; and complete audit trails. Use cases are onboarded through a documented risk assessment.

Key capabilities

  • Model gateway with access, usage, and cost controls
  • Retrieval over approved data sources, with citations
  • Evaluation framework and ongoing quality monitoring
  • Guardrails, sensitive-data filtering, and human review
  • Complete audit trail of prompts, sources, and outputs
  • Use-case intake and risk assessment

Business outcomes

  • A sanctioned AI capability that replaces unmanaged tools
  • Answers traceable to approved sources
  • Documented evidence for AI risk assessments

Aligned to

  • NIST AI RMF
  • ISO/IEC 42001
  • California SAM 4986 and SIMM 5305-F

Technologies

  • Amazon Bedrock
  • Anthropic Claude
  • Amazon OpenSearch Service
  • PostgreSQL with pgvector

Discuss a solution for your organization

Tell us your objectives, constraints, and compliance obligations. A senior engineer replies within one business day.

Contact us